Condonation of delay in filing GSTR-3B returns and entitlement to Section 62 benefit results in withdrawal of assessments and revocation of attachment...
Penalty for estimation of income and disallowances for tax non-deduction clarified: estimation-based penalties not sustainable; additions without conc...
The text examines legal limits on issuing and continuing Look-Out Circulars (LOCs) as restraints on the fundamental right to travel and personal liberty, holding that LOCs are coercive executive measures permitted only where a cognizable offence exists and there is specific, tangible material showing deliberate evasion or a proximate likelihood of absconding; exceptional national or systemic risks warranting narrow application of exceptional powers are required otherwise. It states that requests by public sector bank principals to seek LOCs lack statutory guidance and procedural safeguards and are unsustainable. Practically, LOCs must be periodically reviewed, justified by originating agencies, and may be quashed subject to cooperation undertakings and trial-court permission for future travel.
The text examines legal limits on issuing and continuing Look-Out Circulars (LOCs) as restraints on the fundamental right to travel and personal liberty, holding that LOCs are coercive executive measures permitted only where a cognizable offence exists and there is specific, tangible material showing deliberate evasion or a proximate likelihood of absconding; exceptional national or systemic risks warranting narrow application of exceptional powers are required otherwise. It states that requests by public sector bank principals to seek LOCs lack statutory guidance and procedural safeguards and are unsustainable. Practically, LOCs must be periodically reviewed, justified by originating agencies, and may be quashed subject to cooperation undertakings and trial-court permission for future travel.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
