Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The article addresses whether corpus/sinking fund contributions collected by a residential association constitute "consideration" and attract GST. It applies the statutory definitions of supply and consideration, rejects the doctrine of mutuality by operation of the deeming provision, and treats the association as a person distinct from members. Corpus contributions are characterised as advances for future supply of membership-organisation services and are distinct from recurring monthly maintenance by purpose and accounting. Consequently time-of-supply rules for advances apply and GST liability arises on receipt/collection. Questions on accounting, documentation and audit demonstration were held outside the admissible advance-ruling scope.
The article addresses whether corpus/sinking fund contributions collected by a residential association constitute "consideration" and attract GST. It applies the statutory definitions of supply and consideration, rejects the doctrine of mutuality by operation of the deeming provision, and treats the association as a person distinct from members. Corpus contributions are characterised as advances for future supply of membership-organisation services and are distinct from recurring monthly maintenance by purpose and accounting. Consequently time-of-supply rules for advances apply and GST liability arises on receipt/collection. Questions on accounting, documentation and audit demonstration were held outside the admissible advance-ruling scope.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.