Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
Courier transshipment of imported goods via named carrier to air cargo stations renewed until 30.01.2026; exemption conditional, strict controls apply...
Insurer's investment gains and investment write-downs face Section 263 revision; enquiry upheld, Rule 5(b)(ii) lapse sustained, late corrigendum quash...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7241 to 7260 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Sanction for reassessment beyond three years must be granted by the authority specified in section 151(ii) as it stood prior to the 01.04.2023 amendment; approval by a Principal Commissioner not so empowered rendered the sanction invalid. Relying on binding jurisdictional precedent, the article explains that the proviso inserted w.e.f. 01.04.2023 cannot be applied retrospectively, and consequently notices issued under section 148, orders under section 148A(d) and all consequential reassessment proceedings lacked valid sanction and were quashed. The Tribunal therefore did not address the substantive additions.
Sanction for reassessment beyond three years must be granted by the authority specified in section 151(ii) as it stood prior to the 01.04.2023 amendment; approval by a Principal Commissioner not so empowered rendered the sanction invalid. Relying on binding jurisdictional precedent, the article explains that the proviso inserted w.e.f. 01.04.2023 cannot be applied retrospectively, and consequently notices issued under section 148, orders under section 148A(d) and all consequential reassessment proceedings lacked valid sanction and were quashed. The Tribunal therefore did not address the substantive additions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
