Unlawful outward remittances via Hawala using proforma invoices and electronic records proved; documents admitted, directors penalised, penalties redu...
Attachment of equivalent-value properties as proceeds of crime upheld; preventive attachment order and confirmation sustained; no independent ED reinv...
Estoppel by acceptance of payment prevents appellants who unconditionally accepted amounts under the approved resolution plan from belatedly challenging the plan or prior partial rejection of their claims; those appellants are estopped and their appeals dismissed. Claims not substantiated by the proof mandated under Regulation 19 and Schedule II (Form E/Form F and supporting material) were rightly partially rejected by the Liquidator and cannot be reopened on appeal. Judicial interference with a resolution plan approved by 100% of the CoC is very limited; the plan's provision for priority payment of statutory employee dues (EPF, gratuity, earned leave) and enforcement mechanisms was held adequate, directing the RP and applicant to ensure remittance.
Estoppel by acceptance of payment prevents appellants who unconditionally accepted amounts under the approved resolution plan from belatedly challenging the plan or prior partial rejection of their claims; those appellants are estopped and their appeals dismissed. Claims not substantiated by the proof mandated under Regulation 19 and Schedule II (Form E/Form F and supporting material) were rightly partially rejected by the Liquidator and cannot be reopened on appeal. Judicial interference with a resolution plan approved by 100% of the CoC is very limited; the plan's provision for priority payment of statutory employee dues (EPF, gratuity, earned leave) and enforcement mechanisms was held adequate, directing the RP and applicant to ensure remittance.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
