Reopening of assessment cannot rest solely on an audit party's opinion; reassessment under Section 147/148 is impermissible and power of revision shou...
Tested party selection: functional analysis identified the least complex unit as the appropriate tested party, altering the transfer pricing adjustmen...
Estoppel by acceptance of payment prevents appellants who unconditionally accepted amounts under the approved resolution plan from belatedly challenging the plan or prior partial rejection of their claims; those appellants are estopped and their appeals dismissed. Claims not substantiated by the proof mandated under Regulation 19 and Schedule II (Form E/Form F and supporting material) were rightly partially rejected by the Liquidator and cannot be reopened on appeal. Judicial interference with a resolution plan approved by 100% of the CoC is very limited; the plan's provision for priority payment of statutory employee dues (EPF, gratuity, earned leave) and enforcement mechanisms was held adequate, directing the RP and applicant to ensure remittance.
Estoppel by acceptance of payment prevents appellants who unconditionally accepted amounts under the approved resolution plan from belatedly challenging the plan or prior partial rejection of their claims; those appellants are estopped and their appeals dismissed. Claims not substantiated by the proof mandated under Regulation 19 and Schedule II (Form E/Form F and supporting material) were rightly partially rejected by the Liquidator and cannot be reopened on appeal. Judicial interference with a resolution plan approved by 100% of the CoC is very limited; the plan's provision for priority payment of statutory employee dues (EPF, gratuity, earned leave) and enforcement mechanisms was held adequate, directing the RP and applicant to ensure remittance.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
