Fraudulently obtained SEIS scrips cannot support customs exemption; recovery, confiscation and penalties were sustained, but employee penalty fell awa...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5001 to 5020 of 96176 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Provisional attachment of properties was upheld on the material and recorded admissions showing appellants promoted and collected deposits for illicit schemes and acquired property from those proceeds; the Adjudicating Authority's confirmation therefore required no interference. The tribunal accepted that remuneration, salary or commission earned by persons acting as instruments to procure funds for unlicensed fraudulent schemes constitutes proceeds of crime and may be attached. Properties held by spouses or other recipients were also subject to provisional attachment where evidence showed acquisition from the proceeds and recipients could not demonstrate independent sources. The appeals against confirmation of attachment were dismissed.
Provisional attachment of properties was upheld on the material and recorded admissions showing appellants promoted and collected deposits for illicit schemes and acquired property from those proceeds; the Adjudicating Authority's confirmation therefore required no interference. The tribunal accepted that remuneration, salary or commission earned by persons acting as instruments to procure funds for unlicensed fraudulent schemes constitutes proceeds of crime and may be attached. Properties held by spouses or other recipients were also subject to provisional attachment where evidence showed acquisition from the proceeds and recipients could not demonstrate independent sources. The appeals against confirmation of attachment were dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.