Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Rule 39(1)(a) of the GST Rules survives constitutional challenge when read with the entitlement scheme: the phrase "input tax credit available for distribution in a month" must be construed to mean ITC that has become legally available after satisfaction of entitlement conditions in Section 16(2). The Rule does not mandate distribution merely on invoice issuance; distribution is required in the month the recipient becomes entitled to credit. Show cause notices alleging delayed distribution are remitted for fresh adjudication applying this construction; petitioners given two months to file replies where applicable.
Rule 39(1)(a) of the GST Rules survives constitutional challenge when read with the entitlement scheme: the phrase "input tax credit available for distribution in a month" must be construed to mean ITC that has become legally available after satisfaction of entitlement conditions in Section 16(2). The Rule does not mandate distribution merely on invoice issuance; distribution is required in the month the recipient becomes entitled to credit. Show cause notices alleging delayed distribution are remitted for fresh adjudication applying this construction; petitioners given two months to file replies where applicable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.