Validity of faceless assessment procedure challenged for jurisdictional AO intervention mid-remand, resulting in quashing of assessment for procedural...
Inventory write-off and fraudulent/wrongful trading allegations in corporate insolvency led to director liability principles applied and appeal dismis...
Reliance on precedent by adjudicating authorities must be verified: the article identifies that reliance on non existent, incorrect or irrelevant judicial citations (apparently AI generated) breaches principles of natural justice and produces a procedural defect in reasoned orders; such unverified dependence indicates failure to apply independent judicial mind and can vitiate findings. It recommends prescribing parameters and directions to regulate how quasi judicial authorities rely on High Court and Supreme Court decisions, calls for institutional guidance (including Senior Standing Counsel assistance), and notes interim relief was granted pending formulation and final disposal.
Reliance on precedent by adjudicating authorities must be verified: the article identifies that reliance on non existent, incorrect or irrelevant judicial citations (apparently AI generated) breaches principles of natural justice and produces a procedural defect in reasoned orders; such unverified dependence indicates failure to apply independent judicial mind and can vitiate findings. It recommends prescribing parameters and directions to regulate how quasi judicial authorities rely on High Court and Supreme Court decisions, calls for institutional guidance (including Senior Standing Counsel assistance), and notes interim relief was granted pending formulation and final disposal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
