Fraudulently obtained SEIS scrips cannot support customs exemption; recovery, confiscation and penalties were sustained, but employee penalty fell awa...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5001 to 5020 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Tribunal rejected the Assessing Officer's unexamined application of a higher withholding rate where the payer's case was that payees were unidentified, and held that applicability of the higher rate cannot be presumed without record support. The Tribunal remitted the disallowances under payroll withholding provisions for de novo verification of whether tax was in fact deducted and deposited under Chapter XVII-B, allowing the assessee to file supporting details. Separately, the Tribunal set aside denial of deduction for CSR payments and remitted the matter for AO verification of compliance with statutory conditions for charitable deductions under Chapter VIA.
Tribunal rejected the Assessing Officer's unexamined application of a higher withholding rate where the payer's case was that payees were unidentified, and held that applicability of the higher rate cannot be presumed without record support. The Tribunal remitted the disallowances under payroll withholding provisions for de novo verification of whether tax was in fact deducted and deposited under Chapter XVII-B, allowing the assessee to file supporting details. Separately, the Tribunal set aside denial of deduction for CSR payments and remitted the matter for AO verification of compliance with statutory conditions for charitable deductions under Chapter VIA.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.