Abuse of dominant position allegations against an exchange found not prima facie; regulator reliance on sectoral expertise upheld and no investigation...
Regulatory consolidation for investment advisers: SEBI issues master circular consolidating guidance and prescribing compliance, reporting, fees and s...
Validity of a notice under section 143(2) was contested on limitation and service grounds: the revised/rectified return filed later was held to relate back to the original return date, so the six month limitation for issuing a notice ran from the original filing and expired before the notice dated 22.09.2019; additionally no notice was served within the statutory period due to change of address/name/email, and because service of the section 143(2) notice is mandatory, the assessment was held void and quashed.
Validity of a notice under section 143(2) was contested on limitation and service grounds: the revised/rectified return filed later was held to relate back to the original return date, so the six month limitation for issuing a notice ran from the original filing and expired before the notice dated 22.09.2019; additionally no notice was served within the statutory period due to change of address/name/email, and because service of the section 143(2) notice is mandatory, the assessment was held void and quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
