Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Reopening of assessment was held invalid where the officer who...
Jurisdictional validity: notice issued by a non jurisdictional officer invalidates reassessment where no formal transfer or independent verification occurred.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Reopening of assessment was held invalid where the officer who recorded satisfaction and issued the notice lacked jurisdiction and no formal transfer of jurisdiction was made; the reasons recorded omitted PAN and prior completion under section 143(3) and relied solely on Investigation Wing information without independent verification, rendering assumption of jurisdiction defective. Consequentially reassessment proceedings and the assessment order were quashed as the notice issued by a non jurisdictional officer did not confer valid authority to reopen the completed assessment.
Reopening of assessment was held invalid where the officer who recorded satisfaction and issued the notice lacked jurisdiction and no formal transfer of jurisdiction was made; the reasons recorded omitted PAN and prior completion under section 143(3) and relied solely on Investigation Wing information without independent verification, rendering assumption of jurisdiction defective. Consequentially reassessment proceedings and the assessment order were quashed as the notice issued by a non jurisdictional officer did not confer valid authority to reopen the completed assessment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.