Assessment time-barred u/s 153 due to missing competent-authority reference for Singapore exchange of information; assessment disallowed as barred by ...
Page of 4819
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7241 to 7260 of 96363 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Reopening of assessment was held invalid where the officer who...
Jurisdictional validity: notice issued by a non jurisdictional officer invalidates reassessment where no formal transfer or independent verification occurred.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Reopening of assessment was held invalid where the officer who recorded satisfaction and issued the notice lacked jurisdiction and no formal transfer of jurisdiction was made; the reasons recorded omitted PAN and prior completion under section 143(3) and relied solely on Investigation Wing information without independent verification, rendering assumption of jurisdiction defective. Consequentially reassessment proceedings and the assessment order were quashed as the notice issued by a non jurisdictional officer did not confer valid authority to reopen the completed assessment.
Reopening of assessment was held invalid where the officer who recorded satisfaction and issued the notice lacked jurisdiction and no formal transfer of jurisdiction was made; the reasons recorded omitted PAN and prior completion under section 143(3) and relied solely on Investigation Wing information without independent verification, rendering assumption of jurisdiction defective. Consequentially reassessment proceedings and the assessment order were quashed as the notice issued by a non jurisdictional officer did not confer valid authority to reopen the completed assessment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.