Attachment and proclamation of sale of immovable property: limitation treated from financial year end; proclamation held within period, petition dismi...
Second Schedule attachment and validity of a post-notice mortgage: TRO cannot declare mortgage void ab initio; sale and appropriation allowed thereaft...
Limitation for final assessment under sections 144C and 153 treated jointly, resulting in quashing of timebarred assessment order and liberty to reviv...
Deductibility of settlement payments for securities law penalties and treatment of unexplained cash credits in share trading -- Tribunal upholds posit...
Threshold for allottee-initiated insolvency petitions in leasehold real estate upheld; petition admitted after possession letters deemed legally ineff...
Page of 4814
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6541 to 6560 of 96262 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Reopening of assessment was held invalid where the officer who...
Jurisdictional validity: notice issued by a non jurisdictional officer invalidates reassessment where no formal transfer or independent verification occurred.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Reopening of assessment was held invalid where the officer who recorded satisfaction and issued the notice lacked jurisdiction and no formal transfer of jurisdiction was made; the reasons recorded omitted PAN and prior completion under section 143(3) and relied solely on Investigation Wing information without independent verification, rendering assumption of jurisdiction defective. Consequentially reassessment proceedings and the assessment order were quashed as the notice issued by a non jurisdictional officer did not confer valid authority to reopen the completed assessment.
Reopening of assessment was held invalid where the officer who recorded satisfaction and issued the notice lacked jurisdiction and no formal transfer of jurisdiction was made; the reasons recorded omitted PAN and prior completion under section 143(3) and relied solely on Investigation Wing information without independent verification, rendering assumption of jurisdiction defective. Consequentially reassessment proceedings and the assessment order were quashed as the notice issued by a non jurisdictional officer did not confer valid authority to reopen the completed assessment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.