Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) for alleged non deduction of TDS on contractual payments was rejected after appellate verification of party wise ledgers, TDS returns, certificates and tax audit reports; appellate authority found tax deducted where applicable and set aside the assessing officer's blanket disallowance. Alleged nondisclosure based on Form 26AS entries and invocation of section 145(3) was also rejected because the AO relied on incorrect or double counted figures and ignored reconciliations and the assessee's percentage of completion accounting; the appellate authority's acceptance of reconciliations led to deletion of the addition. Both revenue grounds were dismissed.
Disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) for alleged non deduction of TDS on contractual payments was rejected after appellate verification of party wise ledgers, TDS returns, certificates and tax audit reports; appellate authority found tax deducted where applicable and set aside the assessing officer's blanket disallowance. Alleged nondisclosure based on Form 26AS entries and invocation of section 145(3) was also rejected because the AO relied on incorrect or double counted figures and ignored reconciliations and the assessee's percentage of completion accounting; the appellate authority's acceptance of reconciliations led to deletion of the addition. Both revenue grounds were dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.