Consultancy fees claimed as business expense-can tax disallowance rest on survey suspicion despite invoices, contracts and bank trail? Appeal dismisse...
Page of 4819
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7501 to 7520 of 96365 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) for alleged non deduction of TDS on contractual payments was rejected after appellate verification of party wise ledgers, TDS returns, certificates and tax audit reports; appellate authority found tax deducted where applicable and set aside the assessing officer's blanket disallowance. Alleged nondisclosure based on Form 26AS entries and invocation of section 145(3) was also rejected because the AO relied on incorrect or double counted figures and ignored reconciliations and the assessee's percentage of completion accounting; the appellate authority's acceptance of reconciliations led to deletion of the addition. Both revenue grounds were dismissed.
Disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) for alleged non deduction of TDS on contractual payments was rejected after appellate verification of party wise ledgers, TDS returns, certificates and tax audit reports; appellate authority found tax deducted where applicable and set aside the assessing officer's blanket disallowance. Alleged nondisclosure based on Form 26AS entries and invocation of section 145(3) was also rejected because the AO relied on incorrect or double counted figures and ignored reconciliations and the assessee's percentage of completion accounting; the appellate authority's acceptance of reconciliations led to deletion of the addition. Both revenue grounds were dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
