Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
Courier transshipment of imported goods via named carrier to air cargo stations renewed until 30.01.2026; exemption conditional, strict controls apply...
Insurer's investment gains and investment write-downs face Section 263 revision; enquiry upheld, Rule 5(b)(ii) lapse sustained, late corrigendum quash...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7241 to 7260 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Unrealized mark-to-market loss on principal-protected...
Mark-to-Market losses on principal-protected debentures are deductible as business expenditure when the obligation is crystallized under mercantile accounting.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Unrealized mark-to-market loss on principal-protected benchmark-linked debentures was held deductible as a business expenditure under section 37(1) because legally binding BLD contracts existed before the balance-sheet date, rendering the obligation crystallized and only its quantification uncertain. The Tribunal applied mercantile accounting and accounting standards requiring provision for known liabilities and ascertainable anticipated losses, treated the principal-protection as preventing any offsetting gain, and rejected characterization of the loss as merely contingent. Result: the assessing officer's disallowance was deleted and the MTM loss for the relevant year allowed as a business expense.
Unrealized mark-to-market loss on principal-protected benchmark-linked debentures was held deductible as a business expenditure under section 37(1) because legally binding BLD contracts existed before the balance-sheet date, rendering the obligation crystallized and only its quantification uncertain. The Tribunal applied mercantile accounting and accounting standards requiring provision for known liabilities and ascertainable anticipated losses, treated the principal-protection as preventing any offsetting gain, and rejected characterization of the loss as merely contingent. Result: the assessing officer's disallowance was deleted and the MTM loss for the relevant year allowed as a business expense.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.