NPCI-based bank account validation for IEC applications and modifications enables real-time validation; incorrect details block submission or trigger ...
Creation/Invocation of pledge of securities through depository system: standardized pledge forms, notice requirement and invocation notifications to p...
Calendar Spread margin benefit for Single Stock Derivatives suspended on expiry day for expiring contracts; exchanges must implement systems and rule ...
Proportionate interest, unexplained credits and partner remuneration disputed; proofs of fund nexus and lender identity were decisive and disallowance...
Capital gains valuation from stamp assessment versus net consideration for residential reinvestment: deemed stamp value replaced for gains but not for...
Unrealized mark-to-market loss on principal-protected...
Mark-to-Market losses on principal-protected debentures are deductible as business expenditure when the obligation is crystallized under mercantile accounting.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Unrealized mark-to-market loss on principal-protected benchmark-linked debentures was held deductible as a business expenditure under section 37(1) because legally binding BLD contracts existed before the balance-sheet date, rendering the obligation crystallized and only its quantification uncertain. The Tribunal applied mercantile accounting and accounting standards requiring provision for known liabilities and ascertainable anticipated losses, treated the principal-protection as preventing any offsetting gain, and rejected characterization of the loss as merely contingent. Result: the assessing officer's disallowance was deleted and the MTM loss for the relevant year allowed as a business expense.
Unrealized mark-to-market loss on principal-protected benchmark-linked debentures was held deductible as a business expenditure under section 37(1) because legally binding BLD contracts existed before the balance-sheet date, rendering the obligation crystallized and only its quantification uncertain. The Tribunal applied mercantile accounting and accounting standards requiring provision for known liabilities and ascertainable anticipated losses, treated the principal-protection as preventing any offsetting gain, and rejected characterization of the loss as merely contingent. Result: the assessing officer's disallowance was deleted and the MTM loss for the relevant year allowed as a business expense.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.