Reversal of input tax credit in proportion to exempt supply: specificity of show-cause notice required; order set aside, fresh proceedings allowed wit...
Benami transaction and beneficial ownership: documentary and circumstantial evidence show payors were true beneficiaries, resulting in PBPTA consequen...
Review jurisdiction is limited to discovery of new and material evidence, an error apparent on the face of the record, or analogous sufficient reasons; review applications failed as they reargued matters already decided. The Assessing Authority lacked demonstrated competence or procedural fairness to nullify a certificate under the Income Declaration Scheme, 2016, and the declaration - supported by a Registered Valuer and tax payment - was not successfully impugned. Allegations of benami transactions rested on a retracted statement; absent independent corroborative evidence (bank records or transactional proof) provisional attachment could not be sustained. All review petitions dismissed.
Review jurisdiction is limited to discovery of new and material evidence, an error apparent on the face of the record, or analogous sufficient reasons; review applications failed as they reargued matters already decided. The Assessing Authority lacked demonstrated competence or procedural fairness to nullify a certificate under the Income Declaration Scheme, 2016, and the declaration - supported by a Registered Valuer and tax payment - was not successfully impugned. Allegations of benami transactions rested on a retracted statement; absent independent corroborative evidence (bank records or transactional proof) provisional attachment could not be sustained. All review petitions dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
