Validity of faceless assessment procedure challenged for jurisdictional AO intervention mid-remand, resulting in quashing of assessment for procedural...
Inventory write-off and fraudulent/wrongful trading allegations in corporate insolvency led to director liability principles applied and appeal dismis...
Review jurisdiction is limited to discovery of new and material evidence, an error apparent on the face of the record, or analogous sufficient reasons; review applications failed as they reargued matters already decided. The Assessing Authority lacked demonstrated competence or procedural fairness to nullify a certificate under the Income Declaration Scheme, 2016, and the declaration - supported by a Registered Valuer and tax payment - was not successfully impugned. Allegations of benami transactions rested on a retracted statement; absent independent corroborative evidence (bank records or transactional proof) provisional attachment could not be sustained. All review petitions dismissed.
Review jurisdiction is limited to discovery of new and material evidence, an error apparent on the face of the record, or analogous sufficient reasons; review applications failed as they reargued matters already decided. The Assessing Authority lacked demonstrated competence or procedural fairness to nullify a certificate under the Income Declaration Scheme, 2016, and the declaration - supported by a Registered Valuer and tax payment - was not successfully impugned. Allegations of benami transactions rested on a retracted statement; absent independent corroborative evidence (bank records or transactional proof) provisional attachment could not be sustained. All review petitions dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
