Timing mismatch in income recognition requires verification whether receipts were already taxed in an earlier year; matter remitted for fresh examinat...
FOB transaction value and export incentives: customs valuation cannot override contractual export benefits or support confiscation without valid proof...
Review jurisdiction is limited to discovery of new and material evidence, an error apparent on the face of the record, or analogous sufficient reasons; review applications failed as they reargued matters already decided. The Assessing Authority lacked demonstrated competence or procedural fairness to nullify a certificate under the Income Declaration Scheme, 2016, and the declaration - supported by a Registered Valuer and tax payment - was not successfully impugned. Allegations of benami transactions rested on a retracted statement; absent independent corroborative evidence (bank records or transactional proof) provisional attachment could not be sustained. All review petitions dismissed.
Review jurisdiction is limited to discovery of new and material evidence, an error apparent on the face of the record, or analogous sufficient reasons; review applications failed as they reargued matters already decided. The Assessing Authority lacked demonstrated competence or procedural fairness to nullify a certificate under the Income Declaration Scheme, 2016, and the declaration - supported by a Registered Valuer and tax payment - was not successfully impugned. Allegations of benami transactions rested on a retracted statement; absent independent corroborative evidence (bank records or transactional proof) provisional attachment could not be sustained. All review petitions dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4813 
Join Channel 
