Courier transshipment of imported goods via named carrier to air cargo stations renewed until 30.01.2026; exemption conditional, strict controls apply...
Insurer's investment gains and investment write-downs face Section 263 revision; enquiry upheld, Rule 5(b)(ii) lapse sustained, late corrigendum quash...
Pre-existing disputes and timing of default were decisive: contemporaneous communications and invoices showed plausible disputes on invoices, taxes and reconciliations requiring investigation, and applying the Mobilox and Sabarmati plausibility standard the insolvency petition was not maintainable on that ground. Separately, the contract stipulated default accrual only after a 365-day period from amount becoming due, making the demand notice prima facie premature as no default had occurred on the notice date. The adjudicating authority's rejection of the petition was therefore upheld.
Pre-existing disputes and timing of default were decisive: contemporaneous communications and invoices showed plausible disputes on invoices, taxes and reconciliations requiring investigation, and applying the Mobilox and Sabarmati plausibility standard the insolvency petition was not maintainable on that ground. Separately, the contract stipulated default accrual only after a 365-day period from amount becoming due, making the demand notice prima facie premature as no default had occurred on the notice date. The adjudicating authority's rejection of the petition was therefore upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.