Reopening Assessments invalid where satisfaction and jurisdictional approval are absent for third party seized material, leading to quashing of assess...
Benami property exclusion from the insolvency estate: Benami Act proceedings preclude IBC tribunals from reopening attachments or treating such assets...
Exclusion of limitation period: pandemic suspension plus debtor acknowledgement can extend limitation, requiring fresh factfinding on guarantee invoca...
Pre-existing disputes and timing of default were decisive: contemporaneous communications and invoices showed plausible disputes on invoices, taxes and reconciliations requiring investigation, and applying the Mobilox and Sabarmati plausibility standard the insolvency petition was not maintainable on that ground. Separately, the contract stipulated default accrual only after a 365-day period from amount becoming due, making the demand notice prima facie premature as no default had occurred on the notice date. The adjudicating authority's rejection of the petition was therefore upheld.
Pre-existing disputes and timing of default were decisive: contemporaneous communications and invoices showed plausible disputes on invoices, taxes and reconciliations requiring investigation, and applying the Mobilox and Sabarmati plausibility standard the insolvency petition was not maintainable on that ground. Separately, the contract stipulated default accrual only after a 365-day period from amount becoming due, making the demand notice prima facie premature as no default had occurred on the notice date. The adjudicating authority's rejection of the petition was therefore upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.