Attachment and proclamation of sale of immovable property: limitation treated from financial year end; proclamation held within period, petition dismi...
Second Schedule attachment and validity of a post-notice mortgage: TRO cannot declare mortgage void ab initio; sale and appropriation allowed thereaft...
Limitation for final assessment under sections 144C and 153 treated jointly, resulting in quashing of timebarred assessment order and liberty to reviv...
Deductibility of settlement payments for securities law penalties and treatment of unexplained cash credits in share trading -- Tribunal upholds posit...
Threshold for allottee-initiated insolvency petitions in leasehold real estate upheld; petition admitted after possession letters deemed legally ineff...
The article examines an appellate finding that payments...
Fraudulent trading requires cogent evidence of intent to defraud; ordinary-course payments protected, except post-insolvency withdrawals must be restored.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The article examines an appellate finding that payments characterised as managerial remuneration were not fraudulent trading where there is no cogent evidence of intent to defraud and where payments were made in the ordinary course for legitimate services; such payments were therefore not set aside. A distinct post-commencement cheque withdrawal cleared after insolvency commencement was held to reflect awareness of impending insolvency and must be restored to the corporate debtor. Routing receipts through a sister concern or non-payment of statutory dues, without specific pleading or proof of dishonest design, do not alone establish fraudulent or preferential transactions.
The article examines an appellate finding that payments characterised as managerial remuneration were not fraudulent trading where there is no cogent evidence of intent to defraud and where payments were made in the ordinary course for legitimate services; such payments were therefore not set aside. A distinct post-commencement cheque withdrawal cleared after insolvency commencement was held to reflect awareness of impending insolvency and must be restored to the corporate debtor. Routing receipts through a sister concern or non-payment of statutory dues, without specific pleading or proof of dishonest design, do not alone establish fraudulent or preferential transactions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.