Attachment and proclamation of sale of immovable property: limitation treated from financial year end; proclamation held within period, petition dismi...
Second Schedule attachment and validity of a post-notice mortgage: TRO cannot declare mortgage void ab initio; sale and appropriation allowed thereaft...
Limitation for final assessment under sections 144C and 153 treated jointly, resulting in quashing of timebarred assessment order and liberty to reviv...
Deductibility of settlement payments for securities law penalties and treatment of unexplained cash credits in share trading -- Tribunal upholds posit...
Threshold for allottee-initiated insolvency petitions in leasehold real estate upheld; petition admitted after possession letters deemed legally ineff...
Page of 4814
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6541 to 6560 of 96262 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Tribunal excused a 14 day delay because the financial creditor showed sufficient cause-internal referral and head office approval-so the appeal was admitted. On the central issue of costs imposed when the corporate debtor withdrew under the insolvency withdrawal procedure, the Tribunal found no recorded reason for penalising financial creditors who negotiated settlements and facilitated withdrawal; noting other creditors had not objected, it held the Adjudicating Authority could have adopted alternative measures if withdrawal was improper. Consequently, the direction to impose costs on each financial creditor was set aside.
The Tribunal excused a 14 day delay because the financial creditor showed sufficient cause-internal referral and head office approval-so the appeal was admitted. On the central issue of costs imposed when the corporate debtor withdrew under the insolvency withdrawal procedure, the Tribunal found no recorded reason for penalising financial creditors who negotiated settlements and facilitated withdrawal; noting other creditors had not objected, it held the Adjudicating Authority could have adopted alternative measures if withdrawal was improper. Consequently, the direction to impose costs on each financial creditor was set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.