Reopening of assessment cannot rest solely on an audit party's opinion; reassessment under Section 147/148 is impermissible and power of revision shou...
Tested party selection: functional analysis identified the least complex unit as the appropriate tested party, altering the transfer pricing adjustmen...
The Tribunal excused a 14 day delay because the financial creditor showed sufficient cause-internal referral and head office approval-so the appeal was admitted. On the central issue of costs imposed when the corporate debtor withdrew under the insolvency withdrawal procedure, the Tribunal found no recorded reason for penalising financial creditors who negotiated settlements and facilitated withdrawal; noting other creditors had not objected, it held the Adjudicating Authority could have adopted alternative measures if withdrawal was improper. Consequently, the direction to impose costs on each financial creditor was set aside.
The Tribunal excused a 14 day delay because the financial creditor showed sufficient cause-internal referral and head office approval-so the appeal was admitted. On the central issue of costs imposed when the corporate debtor withdrew under the insolvency withdrawal procedure, the Tribunal found no recorded reason for penalising financial creditors who negotiated settlements and facilitated withdrawal; noting other creditors had not objected, it held the Adjudicating Authority could have adopted alternative measures if withdrawal was improper. Consequently, the direction to impose costs on each financial creditor was set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
