Retrospective application of beneficial circulars upheld, binding officers and granting post adjudication relief where adjudication occurred after cir...
Admissibility of Investigation Statements requires witness examination before the adjudicating authority; otherwise statements cannot sustain a penalt...
Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and c...
Appointment of Registrars as adjudicating officers under Companies Act reallocates territorial jurisdiction and sets appeal route to Regional Director...
Cancellation of GST registration under Section 29(2)(d) was set aside because the cancellation order lacked any reasons and showed no application of mind, and the petitioner was not afforded a personal hearing, breaching principles of natural justice and equality before law. The appellate dismissal on limitation grounds was quashed in view of this primary infirmity and the matter remitted for fresh consideration; the petitioner was directed to be permitted to file a reply and for the adjudicating authority to decide afresh after hearing and taking the defence into account.
Cancellation of GST registration under Section 29(2)(d) was set aside because the cancellation order lacked any reasons and showed no application of mind, and the petitioner was not afforded a personal hearing, breaching principles of natural justice and equality before law. The appellate dismissal on limitation grounds was quashed in view of this primary infirmity and the matter remitted for fresh consideration; the petitioner was directed to be permitted to file a reply and for the adjudicating authority to decide afresh after hearing and taking the defence into account.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
