Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Cancellation of GST registration under Section 29(2)(d) was set aside because the cancellation order lacked any reasons and showed no application of mind, and the petitioner was not afforded a personal hearing, breaching principles of natural justice and equality before law. The appellate dismissal on limitation grounds was quashed in view of this primary infirmity and the matter remitted for fresh consideration; the petitioner was directed to be permitted to file a reply and for the adjudicating authority to decide afresh after hearing and taking the defence into account.
Cancellation of GST registration under Section 29(2)(d) was set aside because the cancellation order lacked any reasons and showed no application of mind, and the petitioner was not afforded a personal hearing, breaching principles of natural justice and equality before law. The appellate dismissal on limitation grounds was quashed in view of this primary infirmity and the matter remitted for fresh consideration; the petitioner was directed to be permitted to file a reply and for the adjudicating authority to decide afresh after hearing and taking the defence into account.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.