Timing mismatch in income recognition requires verification whether receipts were already taxed in an earlier year; matter remitted for fresh examinat...
FOB transaction value and export incentives: customs valuation cannot override contractual export benefits or support confiscation without valid proof...
HC exercised Article 226 writ jurisdiction to restore a cancelled GST registration, applying the revival framework laid down in the cited precedent Tvl. Suguna Cut Piece Center. The court required compliance with filing of returns, payment of tax, interest, fines and fees, imposed restrictions on utilisation of Input Tax Credit pending scrutiny, and directed other safeguards as conditions for revival. The petitioner's electronic credit ledger status and a second inspection informed the factual backdrop, and the writ petition was disposed of by directing revival on those specified conditions.
HC exercised Article 226 writ jurisdiction to restore a cancelled GST registration, applying the revival framework laid down in the cited precedent Tvl. Suguna Cut Piece Center. The court required compliance with filing of returns, payment of tax, interest, fines and fees, imposed restrictions on utilisation of Input Tax Credit pending scrutiny, and directed other safeguards as conditions for revival. The petitioner's electronic credit ledger status and a second inspection informed the factual backdrop, and the writ petition was disposed of by directing revival on those specified conditions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
