Depreciation and routine compliance expenses disallowance did not prove inaccurate particulars or misreporting; penalty sustained only on foreign trav...
Page of 4823
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3381 to 3400 of 96456 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC exercised Article 226 writ jurisdiction to restore a cancelled GST registration, applying the revival framework laid down in the cited precedent Tvl. Suguna Cut Piece Center. The court required compliance with filing of returns, payment of tax, interest, fines and fees, imposed restrictions on utilisation of Input Tax Credit pending scrutiny, and directed other safeguards as conditions for revival. The petitioner's electronic credit ledger status and a second inspection informed the factual backdrop, and the writ petition was disposed of by directing revival on those specified conditions.
HC exercised Article 226 writ jurisdiction to restore a cancelled GST registration, applying the revival framework laid down in the cited precedent Tvl. Suguna Cut Piece Center. The court required compliance with filing of returns, payment of tax, interest, fines and fees, imposed restrictions on utilisation of Input Tax Credit pending scrutiny, and directed other safeguards as conditions for revival. The petitioner's electronic credit ledger status and a second inspection informed the factual backdrop, and the writ petition was disposed of by directing revival on those specified conditions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.