Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
HC exercised Article 226 writ jurisdiction to restore a cancelled GST registration, applying the revival framework laid down in the cited precedent Tvl. Suguna Cut Piece Center. The court required compliance with filing of returns, payment of tax, interest, fines and fees, imposed restrictions on utilisation of Input Tax Credit pending scrutiny, and directed other safeguards as conditions for revival. The petitioner's electronic credit ledger status and a second inspection informed the factual backdrop, and the writ petition was disposed of by directing revival on those specified conditions.
HC exercised Article 226 writ jurisdiction to restore a cancelled GST registration, applying the revival framework laid down in the cited precedent Tvl. Suguna Cut Piece Center. The court required compliance with filing of returns, payment of tax, interest, fines and fees, imposed restrictions on utilisation of Input Tax Credit pending scrutiny, and directed other safeguards as conditions for revival. The petitioner's electronic credit ledger status and a second inspection informed the factual backdrop, and the writ petition was disposed of by directing revival on those specified conditions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
