Benami transaction and beneficial ownership: documentary and circumstantial evidence show payors were true beneficiaries, resulting in PBPTA consequen...
Denial of Preferential Treatment under SAFTA overturned where unchallenged Country of Origin certificate warranted exemption under Notification benefi...
Continuing offence of money-laundering: discharge set aside and proceedings reinstated where laundering continued after inclusion of predicate offence...
Trust objects predominantly included relief of the poor,...
Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under section 80G.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Trust objects predominantly included relief of the poor, education, medical relief, yoga, preservation and advancement of public utility while one clause authorised running mandir, dharamshala and associated religious activities; the deed conferred benefits to all without discrimination and expenditures evidenced activities beyond worship. Explanation 3 excludes charitable purpose only where whole or substantially whole objects are religious; that condition was not met. On these grounds the Tribunal held the religious clause was not overriding, distinguished contrary precedent on facts, set aside the denial of registration and directed grant of registration under section 80G for the year in issue.
Trust objects predominantly included relief of the poor, education, medical relief, yoga, preservation and advancement of public utility while one clause authorised running mandir, dharamshala and associated religious activities; the deed conferred benefits to all without discrimination and expenditures evidenced activities beyond worship. Explanation 3 excludes charitable purpose only where whole or substantially whole objects are religious; that condition was not met. On these grounds the Tribunal held the religious clause was not overriding, distinguished contrary precedent on facts, set aside the denial of registration and directed grant of registration under section 80G for the year in issue.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.