Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT reviewed cancellation of a charitable institution's registration under 10(23C)(vi) and found the cancellation relied on unverified adverse inferences from minor discrepancies rather than a proper enquiry; the tribunal held that issues like duplicate receipts, advance land payments, lease-versus-asset characterisation and small expenditures required detailed scrutiny or assessment (including examination under provisions governing inurement) rather than summary revocation. Applying the proviso and Explanation 2, the recorded reasons did not establish satisfaction of specified violations prior to cancellation; the cancellation order was set aside and registration restored.
ITAT reviewed cancellation of a charitable institution's registration under 10(23C)(vi) and found the cancellation relied on unverified adverse inferences from minor discrepancies rather than a proper enquiry; the tribunal held that issues like duplicate receipts, advance land payments, lease-versus-asset characterisation and small expenditures required detailed scrutiny or assessment (including examination under provisions governing inurement) rather than summary revocation. Applying the proviso and Explanation 2, the recorded reasons did not establish satisfaction of specified violations prior to cancellation; the cancellation order was set aside and registration restored.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.