Misdeclaration of quantity rejected where supplier evidence established counting errors, so reassessment, confiscation and redemption fine were set as...
Admissibility of electronic evidence controls valuation and penalty exposure; non compliant e records and statements nullify revaluation and penalties...
ITAT reviewed cancellation of a charitable institution's registration under 10(23C)(vi) and found the cancellation relied on unverified adverse inferences from minor discrepancies rather than a proper enquiry; the tribunal held that issues like duplicate receipts, advance land payments, lease-versus-asset characterisation and small expenditures required detailed scrutiny or assessment (including examination under provisions governing inurement) rather than summary revocation. Applying the proviso and Explanation 2, the recorded reasons did not establish satisfaction of specified violations prior to cancellation; the cancellation order was set aside and registration restored.
ITAT reviewed cancellation of a charitable institution's registration under 10(23C)(vi) and found the cancellation relied on unverified adverse inferences from minor discrepancies rather than a proper enquiry; the tribunal held that issues like duplicate receipts, advance land payments, lease-versus-asset characterisation and small expenditures required detailed scrutiny or assessment (including examination under provisions governing inurement) rather than summary revocation. Applying the proviso and Explanation 2, the recorded reasons did not establish satisfaction of specified violations prior to cancellation; the cancellation order was set aside and registration restored.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.