Composite GST notices, mandatory limitation, and same-subject bar: HC upheld valid notices but quashed overlapping proceedings and unauthorised withho...
Page of 4821
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3581 to 3600 of 96406 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT reviewed cancellation of a charitable institution's registration under 10(23C)(vi) and found the cancellation relied on unverified adverse inferences from minor discrepancies rather than a proper enquiry; the tribunal held that issues like duplicate receipts, advance land payments, lease-versus-asset characterisation and small expenditures required detailed scrutiny or assessment (including examination under provisions governing inurement) rather than summary revocation. Applying the proviso and Explanation 2, the recorded reasons did not establish satisfaction of specified violations prior to cancellation; the cancellation order was set aside and registration restored.
ITAT reviewed cancellation of a charitable institution's registration under 10(23C)(vi) and found the cancellation relied on unverified adverse inferences from minor discrepancies rather than a proper enquiry; the tribunal held that issues like duplicate receipts, advance land payments, lease-versus-asset characterisation and small expenditures required detailed scrutiny or assessment (including examination under provisions governing inurement) rather than summary revocation. Applying the proviso and Explanation 2, the recorded reasons did not establish satisfaction of specified violations prior to cancellation; the cancellation order was set aside and registration restored.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.