Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
Courier transshipment of imported goods via named carrier to air cargo stations renewed until 30.01.2026; exemption conditional, strict controls apply...
Insurer's investment gains and investment write-downs face Section 263 revision; enquiry upheld, Rule 5(b)(ii) lapse sustained, late corrigendum quash...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7241 to 7260 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Modular kitchen components imported in CKD/SKD condition are classifiable as furniture under Chapter 94 determined at the time and condition of importation, but that classification does not displace the statutory valuation regime: administrative DGOV furniture valuation guidelines cannot override Section 14 or the sequence of the Customs Valuation Rules. Rejection of transaction value and revaluation under Rule 12 and Rule 4 must use truly comparable goods at the same commercial level and substantially the same quantity; a mechanical per kilogram partitioning of invoice value failed the comparability requirement and lacked proof that the parties' relationship influenced price, so enhancement for 11 consignments was set aside while remaining declared values were accepted under Rule 3(3)(a).
Modular kitchen components imported in CKD/SKD condition are classifiable as furniture under Chapter 94 determined at the time and condition of importation, but that classification does not displace the statutory valuation regime: administrative DGOV furniture valuation guidelines cannot override Section 14 or the sequence of the Customs Valuation Rules. Rejection of transaction value and revaluation under Rule 12 and Rule 4 must use truly comparable goods at the same commercial level and substantially the same quantity; a mechanical per kilogram partitioning of invoice value failed the comparability requirement and lacked proof that the parties' relationship influenced price, so enhancement for 11 consignments was set aside while remaining declared values were accepted under Rule 3(3)(a).
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.