Concessional Basic Customs Duty on Ethernet switches: classification as enterprise switches upheld, challenge dismissed for lack of substantial law qu...
Insolvency petition based on admitted debt and default upheld; challenge for malicious initiation rejected, settlement may proceed under resolution fr...
Quashing of FIR and challenge to ECIR over alleged diversion of funds and preferential ESOP pricing dismissed after prima facie money-laundering findi...
Page of 4814
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6581 to 6600 of 96262 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Modular kitchen components imported in CKD/SKD condition are classifiable as furniture under Chapter 94 determined at the time and condition of importation, but that classification does not displace the statutory valuation regime: administrative DGOV furniture valuation guidelines cannot override Section 14 or the sequence of the Customs Valuation Rules. Rejection of transaction value and revaluation under Rule 12 and Rule 4 must use truly comparable goods at the same commercial level and substantially the same quantity; a mechanical per kilogram partitioning of invoice value failed the comparability requirement and lacked proof that the parties' relationship influenced price, so enhancement for 11 consignments was set aside while remaining declared values were accepted under Rule 3(3)(a).
Modular kitchen components imported in CKD/SKD condition are classifiable as furniture under Chapter 94 determined at the time and condition of importation, but that classification does not displace the statutory valuation regime: administrative DGOV furniture valuation guidelines cannot override Section 14 or the sequence of the Customs Valuation Rules. Rejection of transaction value and revaluation under Rule 12 and Rule 4 must use truly comparable goods at the same commercial level and substantially the same quantity; a mechanical per kilogram partitioning of invoice value failed the comparability requirement and lacked proof that the parties' relationship influenced price, so enhancement for 11 consignments was set aside while remaining declared values were accepted under Rule 3(3)(a).
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.