Deferred Payment of Customs Duty extended to Eligible Manufacturer Importers with electronic registration and ICEGATE authentication for conditional c...
Tariff classification determines GST schedule and rate; beverages in Schedule III attract the higher rate, tea extracts and syrups in Schedule I attra...
Fraudulent trading requires cogent evidence of intent to defraud; ordinary-course payments protected, except post-insolvency withdrawals must be resto...
Tribunal found the appellant received proceeds of crime based on...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preserves 180 day rule.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Tribunal found the appellant received proceeds of crime based on traced money flows and undisclosed sources, and therefore provisional attachment was rightly treated as proceeds of crime and confirmed. It held that where tainted proceeds cannot be traced, prior acquired property may be provisionally attached as equivalent value subject to safeguards, and that the attachment here was sustainable. The Tribunal applied the Act's definition of value as fair market value on date of acquisition (or possession) and found attachment did not exceed proceeds attributable to the appellant. The 180 day confirmation period survived by excluding the Supreme Court Covid suspension period.
Tribunal found the appellant received proceeds of crime based on traced money flows and undisclosed sources, and therefore provisional attachment was rightly treated as proceeds of crime and confirmed. It held that where tainted proceeds cannot be traced, prior acquired property may be provisionally attached as equivalent value subject to safeguards, and that the attachment here was sustainable. The Tribunal applied the Act's definition of value as fair market value on date of acquisition (or possession) and found attachment did not exceed proceeds attributable to the appellant. The 180 day confirmation period survived by excluding the Supreme Court Covid suspension period.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.