Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Where registered sale deeds were cancelled and consideration reversed but those documents were not placed before the assessing officer during assessment proceedings, cancelled transactions were treated as not giving rise to taxable income. The document stresses that evidence of cancellation and reversal, when first produced only before the court, defeats assessment orders premised on the original transactions. The assessing officer's failure to consider cancellation and reversal rendered impugned assessment orders unsustainable, resulting in quashing and setting aside of those orders and disposal in light of the cited precedent.
Where registered sale deeds were cancelled and consideration reversed but those documents were not placed before the assessing officer during assessment proceedings, cancelled transactions were treated as not giving rise to taxable income. The document stresses that evidence of cancellation and reversal, when first produced only before the court, defeats assessment orders premised on the original transactions. The assessing officer's failure to consider cancellation and reversal rendered impugned assessment orders unsustainable, resulting in quashing and setting aside of those orders and disposal in light of the cited precedent.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.