Fraudulently obtained SEIS scrips cannot support customs exemption; recovery, confiscation and penalties were sustained, but employee penalty fell awa...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5001 to 5020 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The note addresses limitation for passing final assessment orders where the start of limitation is triggered by a prior Tribunal order; it applies the principle that the limitation period begins from the date of the Tribunal order, obliging the assessing officer to complete the final assessment within the statutory window following that fiscal year-end. Because the DRP issued directions after that prescribed period, the final assessment became time-barred and could not be validly completed. The practical effect: assessments for the relevant year were quashed as barred by limitation and the assessee's challenge succeeds on that ground.
The note addresses limitation for passing final assessment orders where the start of limitation is triggered by a prior Tribunal order; it applies the principle that the limitation period begins from the date of the Tribunal order, obliging the assessing officer to complete the final assessment within the statutory window following that fiscal year-end. Because the DRP issued directions after that prescribed period, the final assessment became time-barred and could not be validly completed. The practical effect: assessments for the relevant year were quashed as barred by limitation and the assessee's challenge succeeds on that ground.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.