Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The article addresses transfer pricing adjustments for NCDs, applying the comparability filter to exclude specified opening NCDs from ALP adjustment and directing that the NCD with 13.20% coupon be benchmarked afresh using the Internal Comparable Uncontrolled Price as the most appropriate method after the assessee had furnished a benchmarking submission. It also holds that an appellate authority may admit a fresh deduction claim for customer incentives and remits quantification to the assessing officer for de novo adjudication. The assessing officer is directed to grant statutory interest on any refund in accordance with law.
The article addresses transfer pricing adjustments for NCDs, applying the comparability filter to exclude specified opening NCDs from ALP adjustment and directing that the NCD with 13.20% coupon be benchmarked afresh using the Internal Comparable Uncontrolled Price as the most appropriate method after the assessee had furnished a benchmarking submission. It also holds that an appellate authority may admit a fresh deduction claim for customer incentives and remits quantification to the assessing officer for de novo adjudication. The assessing officer is directed to grant statutory interest on any refund in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
