Misdeclaration of quantity rejected where supplier evidence established counting errors, so reassessment, confiscation and redemption fine were set as...
Admissibility of electronic evidence controls valuation and penalty exposure; non compliant e records and statements nullify revaluation and penalties...
Transfer pricing issue concerned royalty paid to an associated enterprise where the adjustment was negated in favour of the taxpayer because the earlier appellate decision in the taxpayer's own case on the same issue precluded fresh adjustment; the assessing officer had relied on a prior TPO finding but the appellate precedent established nil ALP, resulting in relief. Separately, claim for deduction under the industrial/infrastructure undertaking provision for participation in a micro irrigation project was allowed after the taxpayer produced execution copies, invoices, payments and certificates; a typographical error in the agreement party name was held not to defeat entitlement and the revenue failed to rebut the evidence.
Transfer pricing issue concerned royalty paid to an associated enterprise where the adjustment was negated in favour of the taxpayer because the earlier appellate decision in the taxpayer's own case on the same issue precluded fresh adjustment; the assessing officer had relied on a prior TPO finding but the appellate precedent established nil ALP, resulting in relief. Separately, claim for deduction under the industrial/infrastructure undertaking provision for participation in a micro irrigation project was allowed after the taxpayer produced execution copies, invoices, payments and certificates; a typographical error in the agreement party name was held not to defeat entitlement and the revenue failed to rebut the evidence.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
