Revisability of return invalidation communications under tax procedure affirmed, impugned non revisional finding quashed and matter remitted for fresh...
Transferable duty credit scrips validity and bona fide transferee entitlement to exemption upheld where scrips were subsisting at import, appeals allo...
Classification of knocked down motor vehicle component imports: Notification benefit denied because items are standalone non kit parts requiring subst...
Reassessment against a deceased assessee: procedural defect mandates fresh reassessment; nonresponsive petitioner may be treated as legal representati...
Page of 4814
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6461 to 6480 of 96262 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Recovery certificate issuance was held to trigger a fresh three-year limitation which, together with judicial exclusion of the period of court-mandated suspension, left residual limitation available. Audited financial statements recording counter guarantee and contingent liability and settlement correspondence were treated as acknowledgments under the Limitation Act, each renewing limitation and rendering the Section 7 insolvency petition timely. Withdrawal of the appellate challenge was permitted after settlement, but closure of the CIRP cannot be effected by appellate withdrawal alone; the financial creditor must pursue the statutory termination route through the insolvency process and the IRP, permitting intervention by other stakeholders.
Recovery certificate issuance was held to trigger a fresh three-year limitation which, together with judicial exclusion of the period of court-mandated suspension, left residual limitation available. Audited financial statements recording counter guarantee and contingent liability and settlement correspondence were treated as acknowledgments under the Limitation Act, each renewing limitation and rendering the Section 7 insolvency petition timely. Withdrawal of the appellate challenge was permitted after settlement, but closure of the CIRP cannot be effected by appellate withdrawal alone; the financial creditor must pursue the statutory termination route through the insolvency process and the IRP, permitting intervention by other stakeholders.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.