Jurisdictional validity: notice issued by a non jurisdictional officer invalidates reassessment where no formal transfer or independent verification o...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5541 to 5560 of 96136 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Recovery certificate issuance was held to trigger a fresh three-year limitation which, together with judicial exclusion of the period of court-mandated suspension, left residual limitation available. Audited financial statements recording counter guarantee and contingent liability and settlement correspondence were treated as acknowledgments under the Limitation Act, each renewing limitation and rendering the Section 7 insolvency petition timely. Withdrawal of the appellate challenge was permitted after settlement, but closure of the CIRP cannot be effected by appellate withdrawal alone; the financial creditor must pursue the statutory termination route through the insolvency process and the IRP, permitting intervention by other stakeholders.
Recovery certificate issuance was held to trigger a fresh three-year limitation which, together with judicial exclusion of the period of court-mandated suspension, left residual limitation available. Audited financial statements recording counter guarantee and contingent liability and settlement correspondence were treated as acknowledgments under the Limitation Act, each renewing limitation and rendering the Section 7 insolvency petition timely. Withdrawal of the appellate challenge was permitted after settlement, but closure of the CIRP cannot be effected by appellate withdrawal alone; the financial creditor must pursue the statutory termination route through the insolvency process and the IRP, permitting intervention by other stakeholders.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.