Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
Receipt of immovable property requires actual possession or enjoyment; redevelopment allotments exchanged for tenancy rights fall outside deemed incom...
Conversion of an adjudication order under the penalty provision to the regular adjudication provision was contested on whether requisite documentary evidence supported claimed input tax credit (ITC). The court found the adjudicating authority had recorded absence of tax invoices and returns and specific findings of deliberate availing of ineligible ITC amounting to fraud, misstatement or suppression; a prior, different-year case was distinguishable because documents had been produced there. In consequence, conversion to the regular provision was refused for want of supporting records and the writ petition failed.
Conversion of an adjudication order under the penalty provision to the regular adjudication provision was contested on whether requisite documentary evidence supported claimed input tax credit (ITC). The court found the adjudicating authority had recorded absence of tax invoices and returns and specific findings of deliberate availing of ineligible ITC amounting to fraud, misstatement or suppression; a prior, different-year case was distinguishable because documents had been produced there. In consequence, conversion to the regular provision was refused for want of supporting records and the writ petition failed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
