Benami transaction and beneficial ownership: documentary and circumstantial evidence show payors were true beneficiaries, resulting in PBPTA consequen...
Denial of Preferential Treatment under SAFTA overturned where unchallenged Country of Origin certificate warranted exemption under Notification benefi...
Continuing offence of money-laundering: discharge set aside and proceedings reinstated where laundering continued after inclusion of predicate offence...
Conversion of an adjudication order under the penalty provision to the regular adjudication provision was contested on whether requisite documentary evidence supported claimed input tax credit (ITC). The court found the adjudicating authority had recorded absence of tax invoices and returns and specific findings of deliberate availing of ineligible ITC amounting to fraud, misstatement or suppression; a prior, different-year case was distinguishable because documents had been produced there. In consequence, conversion to the regular provision was refused for want of supporting records and the writ petition failed.
Conversion of an adjudication order under the penalty provision to the regular adjudication provision was contested on whether requisite documentary evidence supported claimed input tax credit (ITC). The court found the adjudicating authority had recorded absence of tax invoices and returns and specific findings of deliberate availing of ineligible ITC amounting to fraud, misstatement or suppression; a prior, different-year case was distinguishable because documents had been produced there. In consequence, conversion to the regular provision was refused for want of supporting records and the writ petition failed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.