Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
The text addresses whether cross border 'unbilled shipments' qualify as zero rated supply under the IGST regime when no convertible foreign exchange is received. It highlights a statutory tension between liability under Section 7 CGST and entitlement to zero rating under Section 16(1) read with the export definition in Section 2(6) IGST, which requires receipt of consideration in convertible foreign exchange; non receipt may sustain tax liability yet deny zero rating. The court confined adjudication to that interpretative question, issued notice, deferred the refund claim, invited the CBIC to state or clarify its position, and treated the petitioner's factual stance as a representation.
The text addresses whether cross border 'unbilled shipments' qualify as zero rated supply under the IGST regime when no convertible foreign exchange is received. It highlights a statutory tension between liability under Section 7 CGST and entitlement to zero rating under Section 16(1) read with the export definition in Section 2(6) IGST, which requires receipt of consideration in convertible foreign exchange; non receipt may sustain tax liability yet deny zero rating. The court confined adjudication to that interpretative question, issued notice, deferred the refund claim, invited the CBIC to state or clarify its position, and treated the petitioner's factual stance as a representation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.