Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
The text addresses whether cross border 'unbilled shipments' qualify as zero rated supply under the IGST regime when no convertible foreign exchange is received. It highlights a statutory tension between liability under Section 7 CGST and entitlement to zero rating under Section 16(1) read with the export definition in Section 2(6) IGST, which requires receipt of consideration in convertible foreign exchange; non receipt may sustain tax liability yet deny zero rating. The court confined adjudication to that interpretative question, issued notice, deferred the refund claim, invited the CBIC to state or clarify its position, and treated the petitioner's factual stance as a representation.
The text addresses whether cross border 'unbilled shipments' qualify as zero rated supply under the IGST regime when no convertible foreign exchange is received. It highlights a statutory tension between liability under Section 7 CGST and entitlement to zero rating under Section 16(1) read with the export definition in Section 2(6) IGST, which requires receipt of consideration in convertible foreign exchange; non receipt may sustain tax liability yet deny zero rating. The court confined adjudication to that interpretative question, issued notice, deferred the refund claim, invited the CBIC to state or clarify its position, and treated the petitioner's factual stance as a representation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.