Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Indefinite adjournment of a reserved appeal was held unjustified where a related appeal had been admitted but no stay of the admitted matter's operation existed; the tribunal, having reserved its order, could not simply post the case sine die without protecting the assessee's interests. The court found such post-reservation adjournment prejudicial, wasteful of resources and aggravating of grievance, set aside the indefinite postponement, declined to decide merits, and directed the tribunal to determine the appeal in accordance with law within a specified short period.
Indefinite adjournment of a reserved appeal was held unjustified where a related appeal had been admitted but no stay of the admitted matter's operation existed; the tribunal, having reserved its order, could not simply post the case sine die without protecting the assessee's interests. The court found such post-reservation adjournment prejudicial, wasteful of resources and aggravating of grievance, set aside the indefinite postponement, declined to decide merits, and directed the tribunal to determine the appeal in accordance with law within a specified short period.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.