Abuse of dominant position allegations against an exchange found not prima facie; regulator reliance on sectoral expertise upheld and no investigation...
Regulatory consolidation for investment advisers: SEBI issues master circular consolidating guidance and prescribing compliance, reporting, fees and s...
Indefinite adjournment of a reserved appeal was held unjustified where a related appeal had been admitted but no stay of the admitted matter's operation existed; the tribunal, having reserved its order, could not simply post the case sine die without protecting the assessee's interests. The court found such post-reservation adjournment prejudicial, wasteful of resources and aggravating of grievance, set aside the indefinite postponement, declined to decide merits, and directed the tribunal to determine the appeal in accordance with law within a specified short period.
Indefinite adjournment of a reserved appeal was held unjustified where a related appeal had been admitted but no stay of the admitted matter's operation existed; the tribunal, having reserved its order, could not simply post the case sine die without protecting the assessee's interests. The court found such post-reservation adjournment prejudicial, wasteful of resources and aggravating of grievance, set aside the indefinite postponement, declined to decide merits, and directed the tribunal to determine the appeal in accordance with law within a specified short period.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.