Electronic WhatsApp evidence without authentication or independent corroboration cannot sustain an unexplained-investment addition based on third-part...
Mutual current-account transactions excluded from deemed dividend treatment where no fresh borrowing arose; unsupported unsecured-loan addition also f...
ITAT held that contractual rebates conceded by a builder do not give rise to deemed income under the deeming provision where the agreed consideration exceeds the stamp/circle rate and rebates form part of the payment terms, so the addition treating such rebates as income from other sources was deleted. On the exemption claim, the Tribunal found the purchaser's acquisition satisfied the substantive 'purchase' test for residential exemption and that intra-family gifts and co-ownership did not amount to a colourable device to deny eligibility; denial of the exemption was reversed and appeal allowed.
ITAT held that contractual rebates conceded by a builder do not give rise to deemed income under the deeming provision where the agreed consideration exceeds the stamp/circle rate and rebates form part of the payment terms, so the addition treating such rebates as income from other sources was deleted. On the exemption claim, the Tribunal found the purchaser's acquisition satisfied the substantive 'purchase' test for residential exemption and that intra-family gifts and co-ownership did not amount to a colourable device to deny eligibility; denial of the exemption was reversed and appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.